Overcoming prompt sensitivity by tokenization robust self-distillation
Verifying a modification to post-training for LLMs via self-distillation to allow building highly capable and less prompt-sensitive models by exploiting tokenization stochasticity
Verifying a modification to post-training for LLMs via self-distillation to allow building highly capable and less prompt-sensitive models by exploiting tokenization stochasticity
Project Details
Updated 07/12/26 · Edited by orgRecently, Steger et al. showed that exploiting stochasticity in pretraining and fine-tuning results in models that are much less prone to adversarial attacks and prompt sensitivity. Besides, Sims et al. argued that it has benefits in some word game and reasoning-related domains.
However, efficiently applying it to post-training is non-trivial, as common RL approaches lack sample efficiency, which will be amplified by stochastic-induced tokenization variance. On-policy distillation (and its recent extension, self-distillation) provide much more sample-efficient approaches due to Rao-Blackwellization of the estimator. The only obstacle is that naive distillation assumes the same tokenization between teacher and student models.
By exploiting novel findings in cross-tokenizer distillation, we aim to bridge this gap. The project will explore whether stochastic tokenization at post-training and distillation could serve as a theoretically justified option to perform data augmentation without changing the underlying measure on the sequence space, and to which extent does it result in less prompt sensitive and more robust models beyond SFT regime.
Success of the project would bring us an ability to embed robust training into existing RL pipelines and combine with arbitrary novel distillation-based approaches.
Concrete research outputs will include RL training pipelines, reproducible evaluations, open-sourced code and checkpoints, and a research paper for A* conference with findings and recomendations for practitioners in the field.
Important:
The grant will fund execution, not an exploration phase. We've already written most of the theory and algorithms, and tested them on small-scale models.
We intentionally restrict the length of the project to 3-4 months to conduct detailed experiments and deliver a write-up researchers in the field can build upon.
Project members:
Sergei Kudriashov -- core technical contributor and scientific driver of the project, responsible for writing, experiment design and theory.
CAISH research fellow, MARS V; postgraduate student with both industrial and academic research experience. Researcher with multiple publications at top venue ML conferences (ICML, ECCV, EACL). Mentored multiple student projects on RL and adversarial robustness.
Ex-SBER, worked on risk assessment for coding agents and internal production LLM development, evals and benchmarking in financially critical applications.
Jamilia Erkenova -- secondary contributor, responsible for AI infrastructure, conducting experiments and general codebase, besides core algorithmic innovations.
Mentor on technical AI safety courses, data engineer with 2+ years of production experience in a large financial company. Developer of benchmarks for VLM models.
Theory of Impact
Updated 07/17/26 · By grantmaking.aiPrompt sensitivity and tokenization artifacts confounds estimation of LLM capabilities and leads to increased evaluation costs (e.g. Best-of-N sampling) used to lower the estimator's variance. Slight changes in tokenization or punctuation marks were shown to substantially affect resulting behavior, making deployment dangerous in safety critical applications, which necessitates either limiting capabilities or user scenarios in such applications.
Besides, by exploiting non-injectivity of tokenization, models might produce identical surface texts, produces by different token sequences, which limits faithfulness and helps monitor evasion. Notably, unlike adversarial training againts CoT faithfullness, this approach doesn't impose any optimization pressure on particular realizations of CoT traces, making it a scalable alternative.
People
Updated 07/10/26 · Edited by orgTeam Member
Funding Details
- -
- -
- 3-4 months
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.