grantmaking.ai Launch Round
- Research (AI risks, supply chain, misuse patterns)
- Content production & distribution
- Meetup logistics
- Small-scale conference contributions
- Books, papers, paid resources
- Possibly expert consultations
Writing and community-driven initiatives to highlight risks of uncontrolled AI use and promote safe, informed adoption.
Writing and community-driven initiatives to highlight risks of uncontrolled AI use and promote safe, informed adoption.
My plan is to focus on writing publications (blog posts, articles, short books) and organizing events (meetups, conferences) for software professionals and people from various backgrounds to evangelize about the risks of free, unthought, and uncontrolled use of AI. I see how many people around me use AI to share misinformation (without being aware that they are spreading false content), generate content full of mistakes, and do software development without proper code reviews.
I have already started publishing (https://europeanopensource.academy/rising-cost-free-software-how-ai-assisted-development-amplifying-supply-chain-attacks), and with financial support I would be able to conduct my own research, deepen my knowledge, and dedicate more time to educating others and promoting good practices and caution.
The project reduces AI-related existential risk by addressing failure modes that emerge from widespread, uncritical adoption of increasingly capable AI systems. In particular, it targets risks associated with epistemic degradation (misinformation propagation), automation bias, and the integration of unreliable AI-generated outputs into critical software and decision-making pipelines.
By focusing on software professionals and technically literate audiences, the project intervenes at a key leverage point: developers and early adopters who operationalize AI systems at scale. Through publications and events, it promotes practices such as output verification, adversarial thinking about model behavior, secure development workflows, and maintaining human oversight in high-stakes contexts.
This contributes to mitigating systemic risks in several ways: reducing the likelihood of cascading failures caused by erroneous AI-generated code or data, limiting the amplification of false or misleading information, and increasing collective awareness of model limitations and misalignment risks. It also helps counter overreliance on AI systems in domains where robustness and correctness are critical.
In the long term, the project supports the development of a more safety-conscious ecosystem by shaping norms around responsible AI use. These shifts can improve the reliability of human-AI interaction, slow down unsafe deployment patterns, and create stronger demand for aligned, interpretable, and verifiable AI systems.
Team Member
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.