I attended PauseCon Brussels, and while the importance of strategic communication has been stressed in our community for about a year already, this has been the first event that I attended that extensively delved into this and treated it as a lived skill, making people practice communicating about AI risks and adjusting their arguments depending on the audience. I have also been in the WhatsApp group of the event, and you could trully see that it was attended by many doers - people were taking so much action afterwards, just immediatly after people were asking for left over flyers so they can share them on thier way home, people on their train back were approach by EU official saying that they were inspired by how passionate they are and scheduling meetings with them, AI Risks Natwork made a video about the event. I myself got connected with relevant people there who wanted to do something impactful together. I think PauseAI is a catalyst for action for many people, but not always under PauseAI's official umbrella, so not all impactful outcomes get easily captured.
Endorsed.
The donor prospectus explains that the Pause AI movement is shifting to a federated structure, with each federated (national?) body responsible for its own fundraising (with the possibility of some support from the global PauseAI movement.
PauseUK has made solid progress in drawing political attention to AI risks, and I think it's important for the ecosystem to have some actors / advocates that are arguing for a Pause.