Funding ask
The money will be used to cover the compute and my living costs in the Bay area.
I aim to study how representations learned during generative pretraining affect downstream alignment and develop principled methods to prevent goal misgeneralization and improve AI reliability.
I aim to study how representations learned during generative pretraining affect downstream alignment and develop principled methods to prevent goal misgeneralization and improve AI reliability.
This project investigates the following fundamental question: When a generative model is trained to learn a probability distribution from data, what internal representations does it develop, and how do these representations influence its ability to learn and generalize to new goals?
Modern generative models, including language models and diffusion/flow-based models, are typically pretrained using distributional learning objectives. However, accurately modeling a data distribution does not necessarily imply that the model learns representations suitable for downstream tasks or alignment with human objectives. Different representations may achieve similar generative performance while differing substantially in how easily they can be adapted to new goals, particularly under distribution shifts. This may help explain phenomena such as goal misgeneralization, where a model appears to learn the intended objective during training but behaves unexpectedly in new situations.
I aim to study this problem using tools from applied probability, statistics, information theory, and dynamical systems. A central objective is to distinguish alignment failures arising from insufficient information in learned representations from those arising from downstream optimization or generalization. I hope this will lead to both a clearer understanding of alignment and practical methods for making generative models more reliable and controllable. I intend to make the research outputs publicly available, including theoretical results, experimental code, and reproducible benchmarks. If the results are sufficiently strong, I would consider submitting the work to the newly launched Alignment journal as well as to established machine learning venues.
The project is at an early proof-of-concept stage, with preliminary theoretical formulations, computational experiments using small generative models, and promising initial results. The next step is to establish rigorous guarantees and validate practical methods on larger models.
A potential source of catastrophic AI risk is goal misgeneralization: advanced AI systems may appear aligned during training but pursue unintended objectives when deployed in unfamiliar situations. As systems become more capable and autonomous, such failures could have increasingly severe consequences.
My project targets an upstream cause of this risk: generative pretraining may produce representations that encode misleading proxies or fail to preserve information needed for reliable goal alignment. By understanding these mechanisms, I aim to develop methods to predict alignment failures before deployment and improve how models learn and generalize intended objectives.
The causal pathway is: understanding learned representations → identifying conditions that cause goal misgeneralization → developing diagnostics and corrective training methods → enabling more reliable alignment evaluations and interventions → reducing the likelihood of dangerous unintended behavior in advanced AI systems.
The ultimate contribution would be to make alignment failures more predictable, detectable, and preventable rather than relying solely on empirical testing.
Team Member
The money will be used to cover the compute and my living costs in the Bay area.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.